↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Optimal management of fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Title
Optimal management of fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, October 2014
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s56063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hon K Yuen, Melissa A Cunningham

Abstract

Among the host of distressing pathophysiological and psychosocial symptoms, fatigue is the most prevalent complaint in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This review is to update the current findings on non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and modality strategies to manage fatigue in patients with SLE and to provide some recommendations on optimal management of fatigue based on the best available evidence. We performed a systematic literature search of the PubMed and Scopus databases to identify publications on fatigue management in patients with SLE. Based on the studies reported in the literature, we identified nine intervention strategies that have the potential to alleviate fatigue in patients with SLE. Of the nine strategies, aerobic exercise and belimumab seem to have the strongest evidence of treatment efficacy. N-acetylcysteine and ultraviolet-A1 phototherapy demonstrated low-to-moderate levels of evidence. Psychosocial interventions, dietary manipulation (low calorie or glycemic index diet) aiming for weight loss, vitamin D supplementation, and acupuncture all had weak evidence. Dehydroepiandrosterone is not recommended due to a lack of evidence for its efficacy. In addition to taking treatment efficacy and side effects into consideration, clinicians should consider factors such as cost of treatment, commitments, and burden to the patient when selecting fatigue management strategies for patients with SLE. Any comorbidities, such as psychological distress, chronic pain, sleep disturbance, obesity, or hypovitaminosis D, associated with fatigue should be addressed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Unknown 194 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Other 47 24%
Unknown 46 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 13%
Sports and Recreations 9 5%
Psychology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 52 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,343,182
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#159
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,154
of 265,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.