↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Multifunctional gold nanorods and docetaxel-encapsulated liposomes for combined thermo- and chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Multifunctional gold nanorods and docetaxel-encapsulated liposomes for combined thermo- and chemotherapy
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2017
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s143977
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haiying Hua, Nan Zhang, Dan Liu, Lili Song, Tuanbing Liu, Shasha Li, Yongxing Zhao

Abstract

Personalized and precise nanomedicines are highly demanded for today's medical needs. Liposomes are ideal candidates for the construction of multifunctional drug delivery systems. In this study, a liposome was used to improve the clinical issues of docetaxel (Doc), a potent antimitotic chemotherapy for prostate cancer (PC). RLT, a low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)-binding peptide, and PEG were conjugated to the liposomes, and gold nanorods (GNRs) were also incorporated into the liposomes. The GNRs/Doc-liposome-RLT (GNRs/DocL-R) was tested in PC-3 cells and in PC-3 tumor-bearing nude mice. Results showed that GNRs/DocL-R possessed a diameter approximately 163.15±1.83 nm and a zeta potential approximately -32.8±2.16 mV. GNRs/DocL-R showed enhanced intracellular entrance, increased accumulation in the implanted tumor region, and the highest tumor inhibition in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, the multifunctional GNRs/DocL-R was a potential cancer treatment via combined chemo- and thermotherapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 14 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 16 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2017.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,087
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,328
of 331,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#45
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.