Title |
Effects of aural stimulation with capsaicin ointment on swallowing function in elderly patients with non-obstructive dysphagia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.2147/cia.s67602 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eiji Kondo, Osamu Jinnouchi, Hiroki Ohnishi, Ikuji Kawata, Seiichi Nakano, Masakazu Goda, Yoshiaki Kitamura, Koji Abe, Hiroshi Hoshikawa, Hidehiko Okamoto, Noriaki Takeda |
Abstract |
In the present study, an attempt was made to examine the effects of aural stimulation with ointment containing capsaicin on swallowing function in order to develop a novel and safe treatment for non-obstructive dysphagia in elderly patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 15% |
Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 18% |
Unknown | 21 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#15,089,820
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,005
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,015
of 265,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#28
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.