| Title |
Silent and suffering: a pilot study exploring gaps between theory and practice in pain management for people with severe dementia in residential aged care facilities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s64598 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carmelle Peisah, Judith Weaver, Lisa Wong, Julie-Anne Strukovski |
| Abstract |
Pain is common in older people, particularly those in residential aged care facilities (RACF) and those with dementia. However, despite 20 years of discourse on pain and dementia, pain is still undetected or misinterpreted in people with dementia in residential aged care facilities, particularly those with communication difficulties. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 18% |
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 16% |
| Psychology | 20 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 40 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,010
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,913
of 265,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#29
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.