↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Drug abuse in athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Substance abuse and rehabilitation, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 125)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
56 news outlets
twitter
20 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
367 Mendeley
Title
Drug abuse in athletes
Published in
Substance abuse and rehabilitation, August 2014
DOI 10.2147/sar.s53784
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia L Reardon, Shane Creado

Abstract

Drug abuse occurs in all sports and at most levels of competition. Athletic life may lead to drug abuse for a number of reasons, including for performance enhancement, to self-treat otherwise untreated mental illness, and to deal with stressors, such as pressure to perform, injuries, physical pain, and retirement from sport. This review examines the history of doping in athletes, the effects of different classes of substances used for doping, side effects of doping, the role of anti-doping organizations, and treatment of affected athletes. Doping goes back to ancient times, prior to the development of organized sports. Performance-enhancing drugs have continued to evolve, with "advances" in doping strategies driven by improved drug testing detection methods and advances in scientific research that can lead to the discovery and use of substances that may later be banned. Many sports organizations have come to ban the use of performance-enhancing drugs and have very strict consequences for people caught using them. There is variable evidence for the performance-enhancing effects and side effects of the various substances that are used for doping. Drug abuse in athletes should be addressed with preventive measures, education, motivational interviewing, and, when indicated, pharmacologic interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 363 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 69 19%
Student > Master 40 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 9%
Researcher 24 7%
Other 23 6%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 114 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 17%
Sports and Recreations 33 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 7%
Psychology 19 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 4%
Other 85 23%
Unknown 126 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 466. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#58,104
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Substance abuse and rehabilitation
#3
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#413
of 240,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance abuse and rehabilitation
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them