↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Relationship of negative and positive core beliefs about the self with dysfunctional attitudes in three aspects of life

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Relationship of negative and positive core beliefs about the self with dysfunctional attitudes in three aspects of life
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2017
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s150537
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koichi Otani, Akihito Suzuki, Yoshihiko Matsumoto, Toshinori Shirata

Abstract

Cognitive theory assumes a pivotal role of negative core beliefs about the self in dysfunctional attitudes predisposing to depression. Meanwhile, the role of positive core beliefs about the self in cognitive vulnerability to depression is unknown. Therefore, we examined the relationship of negative and positive core beliefs about the self with dysfunctional attitudes in three aspects of life. The subjects were 311 Japanese volunteers. Core beliefs of negative-self and positive-self were evaluated by the corresponding subscales of the Brief Core Schema Scales. Dysfunctional attitudes in the areas of achievement, dependency and self-control were measured by the corresponding subscales of the 24-item Dysfunctional Attitude Scale. The negative-self subscale was correlated with the achievement, dependency and self-control subscales. The positive-self subscale was correlated with the achievement and self-control subscales. The present study suggests that negative core beliefs about the self underlie all types of dysfunctional attitudes, while positive core beliefs about the self have some connections with dysfunctional attitudes related to achievement and self-control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 30%
Other 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 37%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,901
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,800
of 331,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#38
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.