| Title |
A patient preference comparison of Azarga™ (brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination) vs Cosopt® (dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s4088 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas K Mundorf, Steven H Rauchman, Robert D Williams, Ricardo Notivol |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 27% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#820
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,705
of 101,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.