↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Image registration reveals central lens thickness minimally increases during accommodation

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Image registration reveals central lens thickness minimally increases during accommodation
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2017
DOI 10.2147/opth.s144238
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald A Schachar, Majid Mani, Ira H Schachar

Abstract

To evaluate anterior chamber depth, central crystalline lens thickness and lens curvature during accommodation. California Retina Associates, El Centro, CA, USA. Healthy volunteer, prospective, clinical research swept-source optical coherence biometric image registration study of accommodation. Ten subjects (4 females and 6 males) with an average age of 22.5 years (range: 20-26 years) participated in the study. A 45° beam splitter attached to a Zeiss IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Jena, Germany) biometer enabled simultaneous imaging of the cornea, anterior chamber, entire central crystalline lens and fovea in the dilated right eyes of subjects before, and during focus on a target 11 cm from the cornea. Images with superimposable foveal images, obtained before and during accommodation, that met all of the predetermined alignment criteria were selected for comparison. This registration requirement assured that changes in anterior chamber depth and central lens thickness could be accurately and reliably measured. The lens radii of curvatures were measured with a pixel stick circle. Images from only 3 of 10 subjects met the predetermined criteria for registration. Mean anterior chamber depth decreased, -67 μm (range: -0.40 to -110 μm), and mean central lens thickness increased, 117 μm (range: 100-130 μm). The lens surfaces steepened, anterior greater than posterior, while the lens, itself, did not move or shift its position as appeared from the lack of movement of the lens nucleus, during 7.8 diopters of accommodation, (range: 6.6-9.7 diopters). Image registration, with stable invariant references for image correspondence, reveals that during accommodation a large increase in lens surface curvatures is associated with only a small increase in central lens thickness and no change in lens position.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 50%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#3,207
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,752
of 324,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#29
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.