↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Mortality in adults with and without diabetes: is the gap widening?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Mortality in adults with and without diabetes: is the gap widening?
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, November 2017
DOI 10.2147/clep.s148101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiqiang Wang, Huiying Zhang, Meina Liu

Abstract

We aimed to assess if the gap in mortality between adults with and without diabetes has widened over time in US adults. This cohort study included 44,041 adults with diabetes from the US National Health Interview Survey between 1986 and 2009 linked to the National Mortality Index data up to 2011. Each participant with diabetes was matched to two participants without diabetes by age, sex, race, survey year, and region of residence (88,082 persons without diabetes). Mortality differences and hazard ratios were calculated for different time periods defined by three methods, according to 1) survey years with original follow-up durations, 2) follow-up calendar years, and 3) survey years with a fixed 3-year follow-up duration. Different methods of defining time periods produced substantially different mortality rates and changing patterns over time. The decline in mortality was higher when time periods were defined according to survey years with original follow-up durations than with the fixed 3-year duration. Different time periods had comparable baseline and attained ages only when the fixed duration was used. With this method, the gap between adults with and without diabetes progressively decreased from 224 (95% confidence interval 188-260) in 1992-1994 to 99 (65-132) per 10,000 person-years in 2007-2009. Hazard ratios declined significantly from 2.12 (1.88-2.38) in 1995-1997 to 1.70 (1.44-2.00) in 2007-2009. The decline in mortality over time was greater among adults with diabetes than those without diabetes. The gap in mortality between adults with diabetes and those without diabetes significantly narrowed in recent years, and was more than halved over the last 15 years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Mathematics 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2017.
All research outputs
#12,863,066
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#340
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,446
of 329,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.