↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Devices for continuous monitoring of glucose: update in technology

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Devices for continuous monitoring of glucose: update in technology
Published in
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, September 2017
DOI 10.2147/mder.s110121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana María Gómez, Diana Cristina Henao Carrillo, Oscar Mauricio Muñoz Velandia

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is a tool that allows constant evaluation of glycemic control, providing data such as the trend and fluctuation of interstitial glucose levels over time. In clinical practice, there are two modalities: the professional or retrospective and the personal or real-time CGM (RT-CGM). The latest-generation sensors are more accurate and sensitive for hypoglycemia, improving adherence to self-monitoring, which has allowed optimizing glycemic control. The development of algorithms that allow the suspension of the infusion of insulin during hypoglycemia gave rise to the integrated therapy or sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy with low glucose suspend, which has proven to be an effective and safe alternative in the treatment of diabetic patients with high risk of hypoglycemia. The objective of this review is to present the evidence of the advantages of RT-CGM, the clinical impact of integrated therapy, and cost-effectiveness of its implementation in the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 22%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 6%
Engineering 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 28 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,236,887
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#89
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,321
of 324,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.