↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Diagnosis and management of food allergies: new and emerging options: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asthma and Allergy, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis and management of food allergies: new and emerging options: a systematic review
Published in
Journal of Asthma and Allergy, October 2014
DOI 10.2147/jaa.s49277
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew W O’Keefe, Sarah De Schryver, Jennifer Mill, Christopher Mill, Alizee Dery, Moshe Ben-Shoshan

Abstract

It is reported that 6% of children and 3% of adults have food allergies, with studies suggesting increased prevalence worldwide over the last few decades. Despite this, our diagnostic capabilities and techniques for managing patients with food allergies remain limited. We have conducted a systematic review of literature published within the last 5 years on the diagnosis and management of food allergies. While the gold standard for diagnosis remains the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, this assessment is resource intensive and impractical in most clinical situations. In an effort to reduce the need for the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, several risk-stratifying tests are employed, namely skin prick testing, measurement of serum-specific immunoglobulin E levels, component testing, and open food challenges. Management of food allergies typically involves allergen avoidance and carrying an epinephrine autoinjector. Clinical research trials of oral immunotherapy for some foods, including peanut, milk, egg, and peach, are under way. While oral immunotherapy is promising, its readiness for clinical application is controversial. In this review, we assess the latest studies published on the above diagnostic and management modalities, as well as novel strategies in the diagnosis and management of food allergy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 134 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 20%
Student > Master 18 13%
Other 16 12%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,724,549
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#133
of 480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,421
of 254,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them