↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Does eating less make you live longer and better? An update on calorie restriction

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Does eating less make you live longer and better? An update on calorie restriction
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2017
DOI 10.2147/cia.s126458
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Picca, Vito Pesce, Angela Maria Serena Lezza

Abstract

The complexity of aging is hard to be captured. However, apart from its tissue-specific features, a structural and functional progressive decline of the whole organism that leads to death, often preceded by a phase of chronic morbidity, characterizes the common process of aging. Therefore, the research goal of scientists in the field moved from the search for strategies able to extend longevity to those ensuring healthy aging associated with a longer lifespan referred to as "healthspan". The aging process is plastic and can be tuned by multiple mechanisms including dietary and genetic interventions. To date, the most robust approach, efficient in warding off the cellular markers of aging, is calorie restriction (CR). Here, after a preliminary presentation of the major debate originated by CR, we concisely overviewed the recent results of CR treatment on humans. We also provided an update on the molecular mechanisms involved by CR and the effects on some of the age-associated cellular markers. We finally reviewed a number of tested CR mimetics and concluded with an evaluation of future applications of such dietary approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Master 14 11%
Researcher 12 10%
Other 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 34 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 43 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#971,479
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#84
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,455
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#4
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.