↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Structural and functional characterization of the Helicobacter pylori cytidine 5'-monophosphate-pseudaminic acid synthase PseF: molecular insight into substrate recognition and catalysis mechanism

Overview of attention for article published in Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Structural and functional characterization of the Helicobacter pylori cytidine 5'-monophosphate-pseudaminic acid synthase PseF: molecular insight into substrate recognition and catalysis mechanism
Published in
Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC, October 2017
DOI 10.2147/aabc.s139773
Pubmed ID
Authors

Syeda Umme Habiba Wahid

Abstract

The bacterium Helicobacter pylori is a human gastric pathogen that can cause a wide range of diseases, including chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer and gastric carcinoma. It is classified as a definitive (class I) human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Flagella-mediated motility is essential for H. pylori to initiate colonization and for the development of infection in human beings. Glycosylation of the H. pylori flagellum with pseudaminic acid (Pse; 5,7-diacetamido-3,5,7,9-tetradeoxy-l-glycero-l-manno-nonulosonic acid) is essential for flagella assembly and function. The sixth step in the Pse biosynthesis pathway, activation of Pse by addition of a cytidine 5'-monophosphate (CMP) to generate CMP-Pse, is catalyzed by a metal-dependent enzyme pseudaminic acid biosynthesis protein F (PseF) using cytidine 5'-triphosphate (CTP) as a cofactor. No crystal-structural information for PseF is available. This study describes the first three-dimensional model of H. pylori PseF obtained using biocomputational tools. PseF harbors an α/β-type hydrolase fold with a β-hairpin (HP) dimerization domain. Comparison of PseF with other structural homologs allowed identification of crucial residues for substrate recognition and the catalytic mechanism. This structural information would pave the way to design novel therapeutics to combat bacterial infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Lecturer 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 3 15%
Chemistry 3 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC
#34
of 55 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,968
of 331,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them