↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The role of pain in pulmonary rehabilitation: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
The role of pain in pulmonary rehabilitation: a qualitative study
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, November 2017
DOI 10.2147/copd.s145442
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha L Harrison, Annemarie L Lee, Helene L Elliott-Button, Rebecca Shea, Roger S Goldstein, Dina Brooks, Cormac G Ryan, Denis J Martin

Abstract

One third of individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) report pain. To help inform a COPD-specific pain intervention, we explored the views of health care providers (HCPs) and individuals with COPD on pain during pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). This is a qualitative study using inductive thematic analysis. Eighteen HCPs familiar with PR and 19 patients enrolled in PR participated in semi-structured interviews. Demographic data were recorded, and the patients completed the Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form). 1) Interaction between pain and COPD: pain is a common experience in COPD, heightened by breathlessness and anxiety. 2) Pain interfering with PR: a) Communicating pain: HCPs rarely ask about pain and patients are reluctant to report it for fear of being removed from PR. b) PR is a short-term aggravator but long-term reliever: although pain limits exercise, concentration, and program adherence, PR may reduce pain by increasing muscle strength and improving coping. c) Advice and strategies for pain: some attention is given to pain management but this is often counterproductive, encouraging patients to cease exercise. 3) An intervention to manage pain: HCPs were enthusiastic about delivering a pain intervention within their knowledge and time constraints. Early group education was preferred. A pain intervention seems warranted in PR and may improve adherence and therefore clinical benefit. A pain intervention could be provided as part of PR education with HCP training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Lecturer 4 4%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 30 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 16%
Psychology 6 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 37 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,311,777
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#639
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,130
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#17
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.