↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Augmentation treatment in major depressive disorder: focus on aripiprazole

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Augmentation treatment in major depressive disorder: focus on aripiprazole
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2008
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s3369
Pubmed ID
Authors

J Craig Nelson, Andrei Pikalov, Robert M Berman

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a disabling psychiatric condition for which effective treatment remains an outstanding need. Antidepressants are currently the mainstay of treatment for depression; however, almost two-thirds of patients will fail to achieve remission with initial treatment. As a result, a range of augmentation and combination strategies have been used in order to improve outcomes for patients. Despite the popularity of these approaches, limited data from double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies are available to allow clinicians to determine which are the most effective augmentation options or which patients are most likely to respond to which options. Recently, evidence has shown that adjunctive therapy with atypical antipsychotics has the potential for beneficial antidepressant effects in the absence of psychotic symptoms. In particular, aripiprazole has shown efficacy as an augmentation option with standard antidepressant therapy in two, large, randomized, double-blind studies. Based on these efficacy and safety data, aripiprazole was recently approved by the FDA as adjunctive therapy for MDD. The availability of this new treatment option should allow more patients with MDD to achieve remission and, ultimately, long-term, successful outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 23 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 28%
Psychology 9 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,485,722
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#319
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,194
of 97,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.