↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Triclosan resistance reversion by encapsulation in chitosan-coated-nanocapsule containing α-bisabolol as core: development of wound dressing

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Triclosan resistance reversion by encapsulation in chitosan-coated-nanocapsule containing α-bisabolol as core: development of wound dressing
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2017
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s143324
Pubmed ID
Authors

João Guilherme B De Marchi, Denise S Jornada, Fernanda K Silva, Ana L Freitas, Alexandre M Fuentefria, Adriana R Pohlmann, Silvia S Guterres

Abstract

The use of nanoparticles may be particularly advantageous in treating bacterial infections due to their multiple simultaneous mechanisms of action. Nanoencapsulation is particularly useful for lipophilic drugs. In this scenario, triclosan is considered a good candidate due to its lipophilicity, broad-spectrum activity, and safety. In the present study, we have developed and characterized an antimicrobial suspension of triclosan and α-bisabolol against pathogenic strains that are resistant (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and susceptible (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans) to triclosan. We also aimed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration, using serial microdilution adapted from a CLSI methodology (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute). Challenge test was used to confirm the antimicrobial effectiveness of the nanocapsule formulation, as well as after its incorporation into a commercial wound dressing (Veloderm(®)). The zeta potential of P. aeruginosa before and after contact with cationic nanocapsules and the ratio between the number of nanocapsules per colony forming unit (CFU) were determined to evaluate a possible interaction between nanocapsules and bacteria. The results showed that nanoencapsulation has improved the antimicrobial activity when tested with two different methodologies. The number of nanocapsules per CFU was high even in great dilutions and the zeta potential was reverted after being in contact with the cationic nanocapsules. The nanocapsules were able to improve the activity of triclosan, even when tested within 28 days and when dried in the wound dressing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Lecturer 4 9%
Professor 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 11%
Engineering 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 16 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,470
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,800
of 331,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#51
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.