↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Highly sensitive protein detection via covalently linked aptamer to MoS2 and exonuclease-assisted amplification strategy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Highly sensitive protein detection via covalently linked aptamer to MoS2 and exonuclease-assisted amplification strategy
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2017
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s145585
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Gao, Qin Li, Zebin Deng, Brendan Brady, Ni Xia, Yang Zhou, Haixia Shi

Abstract

Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) has shown highly attractive superiority as a platform for sensing. However, DNA physisorption on the surface of MoS2 was susceptible to nonspecific probe displacement and false-positive signals. To solve these problems, we have developed a novel MoS2-aptamer nanosheet biosensor for detecting thrombin using a covalently linked aptamer to the MoS2 nanosheet. Ten percent Tween 80 was used to prevent thrombin from nonspecific binding and to rapidly form thiol-DNA/gold nanoparticle (AuNP) conjugates. Furthermore, an MoS2 and exonuclease coassisted signal amplification strategy was developed to improve the detection limit for thrombin. We used the hybridization of the aptamer molecules and the matched strand with a 5' terminal thiol to immobilize the aptamer molecules on the surface of AuNPs in AuNPs@MoS2 nanocomposites. Exonuclease digested the single-strand aptamer and released the thrombin, which was then detected in the next recycle. With the coassisted amplification strategy, a 6 fM detection limit was achieved, showing that this method has higher sensitivity than most reported methods for thrombin detection. The results presented in this work show that this method of covalently attaching the aptamer and using the coassisted amplification is a promising technique for the detection of protein in medical diagnostics.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Master 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Psychology 1 6%
Materials Science 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3,598
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,092
of 331,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#79
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.