↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Management of refractory pityriasis rubra pilaris: challenges and solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Management of refractory pityriasis rubra pilaris: challenges and solutions
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, November 2017
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s124351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gaia Moretta, Erika V De Luca, Alessandro Di Stefani

Abstract

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare chronic inflammatory papulosquamous skin disease. Its clinical presentation and evolution is very variable. The most frequent clinical features are follicular papules, progressing to yellow-orange erythroderma with round small areas of normal skin and the well-demarcated palmoplantar keratoderma. Actually, six different types of PRP have been described based on clinical characteristics, age of onset, and prognosis. The pathogenesis is still unknown, and treatment can be challenging. Available treatments are mainly based on case reports or case series of clinical experience because no controlled randomized trials have never been performed because of the rarity of the condition. Traditional systemic treatment consists in retinoids, which are actually considered as first-line therapy, but refractory cases that do not respond or relapse after drug interruption do exist. In recent years, numerous reports have demonstrated the efficacy of new agents such as biological drugs. This article is an overview on available therapeutic options, in particular for refractory forms of PRP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Other 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Design 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#718
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,227
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#16
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.