↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Current perspectives in HIV post-exposure prophylaxis

Overview of attention for article published in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 330)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
Title
Current perspectives in HIV post-exposure prophylaxis
Published in
HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), October 2014
DOI 10.2147/hiv.s46585
Pubmed ID
Authors

Binta Sultan, Paul Benn, Laura Waters

Abstract

The incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection continues to rise among core groups and efforts to reduce the numbers of new infections are being redoubled. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is the use of short-term antiretroviral therapy (ART) to reduce the risk of acquisition of HIV infection following exposure. Current guidelines recommend a 28-day course of ART within 36-72 hours of exposure to HIV. As long as individuals continue to be exposed to HIV there will be a role for PEP in the foreseeable future. Nonoccupational PEP, the vast majority of which is for sexual exposure (PEPSE), has a significant role to play in HIV prevention efforts. Awareness of PEP and its availability for both clinicians and those who are eligible to receive it are crucial to ensure that PEP is used to its full potential in any HIV prevention strategy. In this review, we provide current evidence for the use of PEPSE, assessment of the risk of HIV transmission, indications for PEP, drug regimens, and management of patients started on PEP. We summarize national and international guidelines for the use of PEPSE. We explore the place of PEP within the wider strategy of reducing HIV incidence rates in the era of treatment as prevention and pre-exposure prophylaxis. We also consider the implications of recent data from interventional and observational studies demonstrating significant reductions in the risk of HIV transmission within a serodiscordant relationship if the HIV-positive partner is taking effective ART upon PEP guidelines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 214 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 18%
Student > Bachelor 34 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Other 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 54 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 57 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,966,238
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#22
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,082
of 265,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them