↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Impact of hypertrophic pulmonary osteoarthropathy on patients with lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Impact of hypertrophic pulmonary osteoarthropathy on patients with lung cancer
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, October 2017
DOI 10.2147/ott.s139558
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu-Hung Fang, Chien-Chin Hsu, Meng-Jer Hsieh, Ming-Szu Hung, Ying-Huang Tsai, Yu-Ching Lin

Abstract

Hypertrophic pulmonary osteoarthropathy (HPOA) is a rare disease that most commonly occurs secondary to lung cancer. However, the clinical significance of HPOA remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of HPOA on patients with lung cancer in Taiwan. Data regarding lung cancer patients who demonstrated findings of HPOA on bone scintigraphy between 2010 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Pathological confirmation of cases was conducted at Chiayi and Kaohsiung Chang Gang Memorial Hospital. Clinical characteristics, including gender, smoking status, histology subtype, clinical stage, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status were investigated. We identified 69 lung cancer patients with typical HPOA findings on bone scintigraphy. Among them, 56 were male (81.2%) and 51 were ex-smokers or current smokers (73.9%). Adenocarcinoma was the most common histology subtype (n=42, 60.9%). Of 34 patients subjected to EGFR mutation analysis, only 4 (11.8%) had EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI)-sensitive mutations. Male, smoking, and adenocarcinoma were the most common clinical characteristics of lung cancer patients with HPOA in our cohort. However, the proportion of EGFR-TKI-sensitive mutation cases was extremely low.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,147
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,800
of 331,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#35
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.