| Title |
To what extent is treatment adherence of psychiatric patients influenced by their participation in shared decision making?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s73029 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos De las Cuevas, Wenceslao Peñate, Luis de Rivera |
| Abstract |
Nonadherence to prescribed medications is a significant barrier to the successful treatment of psychiatric disorders in clinical practice. It has been argued that patient participation in shared decision making improves adherence to treatment plans. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
| Researcher | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 25 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2014.
All research outputs
#17,450,897
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,067
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,265
of 274,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.