↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Exome and transcriptome sequencing identifies loss of PDLIM2 in metastatic colorectal cancers

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Exome and transcriptome sequencing identifies loss of PDLIM2 in metastatic colorectal cancers
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, November 2017
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s149002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bo Young Oh, Jeonghee Cho, Hye Kyung Hong, Joon Seol Bae, Woong-Yang Park, Je-Gun Joung, Yong Beom Cho

Abstract

Understanding the genomic determinants associated with metastasis in colorectal cancers (CRCs) provides crucial clues for improving patient care. In this study, we performed whole-exome sequencing as well as RNA sequencing analyses on five pairs of primary and liver metastasized samples from CRC patients together with blood/normal control samples for each pair. We identified genomic deletions in the region of 8p21-23 (q value <0.01) from analysis of recurrent regions with copy number variations in both primary and matched metastatic lesions. Consistent with this result, we found significantly decreased expression levels of all 12 genes (ADAMDEC1, C8orf80, CLDN23, EPHX2, GFRA2, NEFL, NEFM, PDLIM2, PTK2B, SCARA5, SLC18A1 and STMN4) located within this region (adjusted P<0.01). Notably, the mRNA levels of PDLIM2, a key regulator of well-known cancer-associated genes including the proto-oncogene c-MYC, an early response gene IER3, and regulators of apoptosis such as BCL2, FAS, and FASLG, were highly downregulated in tumors compared to normal tissues. Taken together, our findings uncovered various genomic alterations potentially leading to metastasis in CRC and provide important insights into the development of potential therapeutic targets for preventing metastatic progression of CRC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 11 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Computer Science 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Chemistry 2 8%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 12 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,958,596
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#639
of 2,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,789
of 329,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#17
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.