↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Skin-whitening and skin-condition-improving effects of topical oxidized glutathione: a double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trial in healthy women

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 936)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
46 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Skin-whitening and skin-condition-improving effects of topical oxidized glutathione: a double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trial in healthy women
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, October 2014
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s68424
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fumiko Watanabe, Erika Hashizume, Gertrude P Chan, Ayako Kamimura

Abstract

Glutathione is a tripeptide consisting of cysteine, glycine, and glutamate and functions as a major antioxidant. It is synthesized endogenously in humans. Glutathione protects thiol protein groups from oxidation and is involved in cellular detoxification for maintenance of the cell environment. Reduced glutathione (GSH) has a skin-whitening effect in humans through its tyrosinase inhibitory activity, but in the case of oxidized glutathione (GSSG) this effect is unclear. We examined the skin-whitening and skin-condition effects of topical GSSG in healthy women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 17%
Student > Master 15 10%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 6 4%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 75 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Chemistry 7 4%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 80 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 176. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#240,288
of 26,231,860 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#32
of 936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,114
of 266,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,231,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.