Title |
Systematic review of the association between Alzheimer’s disease and chronic glaucoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.2147/opth.s69534 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexandros Tsilis, George Kitsos, Sygkliti-Henriette Pelidou, Konstantinos Tsilidis |
Abstract |
A potential association between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and chronic glaucoma has been suggested but results of epidemiological studies have been inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and critical appraisal of this literature. We searched systematically in PubMed from December 1964 to September 2013 and identified 239 articles potentially relevant for abstract and full-text review. Statistical heterogeneity (variability) across studies was evaluated using the Cochran Q test and the I (2) statistic, and the Newcastle-Ottawa score was used to assess study quality. Ten studies were finally selected. Compared to non-demented participants, patients with AD had a statistically significant decreased risk of glaucoma but the results were very heterogeneous, and thus summary estimates were not reported (I (2), 89%; P heterogeneity, <0.001). The study results ranged from large positive relative risks identified in small and poorly-conducted studies to weak inverse associations or null estimates observed in some cohort and record-linkage studies, but the summary estimates were essentially driven by a large retrospective cohort using medical claims that may be afflicted by underdiagnosis bias. There was also evidence for substantial publication bias (Egger's P≤0.01). The association of AD and glaucoma is heterogeneous and most studies are small and inadequately designed. Large prospective studies with long follow-ups are warranted to clarify this association. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
Professor | 3 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 32% |
Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 32% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 19% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 16% |