↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Variations in patient safety climate and perceived quality of collaboration between professions in out-of-hours care

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Variations in patient safety climate and perceived quality of collaboration between professions in out-of-hours care
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, November 2017
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s149011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zalika Klemenc-Ketis, Ellen Tveter Deilkås, Dag Hofoss, Gunnar Tschudi Bondevik

Abstract

To get an overview of health care workers perceptions of patient safety climates and the quality of collaboration in Slovenian out-of-hours health care (OOHC) between professional groups. This was a cross-sectional study carried out in all (60) Slovenian OOHC clinics; 37 (61.7%) agreed to participate with 438 employees. The questionnaire consisted of the Slovenian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire - Ambulatory Version (SAQ-AV). The study sample consisted of 175 (70.0%) physicians, nurse practitioners, and practice nurses. Practice nurses reported the highest patient safety climate scores in all dimensions. Total mean (standard deviation) SAQ-AV score was 60.9±15.2. Scores for quality of collaboration between different professional groups were high. The highest mean scores were reported by nurse practitioners on collaboration with practice nurses (4.4±0.6). The lowest mean scores were reported by practice nurses on collaboration with nurse practitioners (3.8±0.9). Due to large variations in Slovenian OOHC clinics with regard to how health care workers from different professional backgrounds perceive safety culture, more attention should be devoted to improving the team collaboration in OOHC. A clearer description of professional team roles should be provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 18 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 20 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,483,707
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#510
of 832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,079
of 329,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.