Title |
Extended roles for allied health professionals: an updated systematic review of the evidence
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.2147/jmdh.s66746 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robyn Saxon, Marion Gray, Florin Oprescu |
Abstract |
Internationally, health care services are under increasing pressure to provide high quality, accessible, timely interventions to an ever increasing aging population, with finite resources. Extended scope roles for allied health professionals is one strategy that could be undertaken by health care services to meet this demand. This review builds upon an earlier paper published in 2006 on the evidence relating to the impact extended scope roles have on health care services. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 163 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 39 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 6% |
Researcher | 10 | 6% |
Other | 30 | 18% |
Unknown | 40 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 38% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 15% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
Psychology | 4 | 2% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 12% |
Unknown | 46 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,904,172
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#139
of 815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,771
of 253,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.