↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The genetics of Leigh syndrome and its implications for clinical practice and risk management

Overview of attention for article published in The Application of Clinical Genetics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
Title
The genetics of Leigh syndrome and its implications for clinical practice and risk management
Published in
The Application of Clinical Genetics, November 2014
DOI 10.2147/tacg.s46176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilene S Ruhoy, Russell P Saneto

Abstract

Leigh syndrome, also referred to as subacute necrotizing encephalomyelopathy, is a severe, early-onset neurodegenerative disorder that is relentlessly progressive and devastating to both the patient and the patient's family. Attributed to the ultimate failure of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, once it starts, the disease often results in the regression of both mental and motor skills, leading to disability and rapid progression to death. It is a mitochondrial disorder with both phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity. The cause of death is most often respiratory failure, but there are a whole host of complications, including refractory seizures, that may further complicate morbidity and mortality. The symptoms may develop slowly or with rapid progression, usually associated with age of onset. Although the disease is usually diagnosed within the first year of life, it is important to note that recent studies reveal phenotypic heterogeneity, with some patients having evidence of in utero presentation and others having adult-onset symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 236 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 14%
Student > Master 28 12%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 58 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 14%
Neuroscience 16 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 66 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,769,995
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Application of Clinical Genetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,207
of 274,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Application of Clinical Genetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them