↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake predicts MET expression in lung adenocarcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake predicts MET expression in lung adenocarcinoma
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, November 2017
DOI 10.2147/ott.s150334
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuxian An, Xiang Zhou, Jianjun Liu, Gang Huang

Abstract

MET is a member of the receptor tyrosine kinases. Several MET-targeting inhibitors and antagonistic antibodies have shown promising data in clinical trials of lung adenocarcinoma. Finding noninvasive diagnostic tools to estimate the status of MET is helpful in clinical practice. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) has been used routinely for the diagnosis and staging of tumors. However, the relationship between MET expression and 18F-FDG uptake has not been investigated yet. This study aimed to determine the correlation of MET expression with 18F-FDG uptake on PET-CT scan and whether or not 18F-FDG PET/CT can be used to predict the MET status of lung adenocarcinoma patients. Fifty-seven lung adenocarcinoma patients were analyzed in our study. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was calculated in all PET/CT images. The expression levels of MET and two important glycolysis-related markers, glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) and pyruvate kinase M2, were analyzed by immunohistochemistry of tissues. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyze the association between MET expression and SUVmax. In vitro MET knockdown in lung adenocarcinoma cells was used to examine the role of MET in tumor metabolism. The effect of MET on GLUT1 expression was investigated using Western blot assay and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. SUVmax was positively correlated with the expression levels of MET (r=0.458; P<0.001) and GLUT1 (r=0.551; P<0.001). SUVmax was significantly higher in patients with positive MET expression than in those with negative MET expression (9.92±6.62 vs 4.60±3.00; P=0.002). MET knockdown in lung adenocarcinoma cells led to a significant decrease in GLUT1 expression and 18F-FDG uptake. MET could increase 18F-FDG uptake by upregulating GLUT1 expression. 18F-FDG PET/CT could be used to predict the MET status of lung adenocarcinoma patients and to supply valuable information to guide targeted therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Lecturer 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 33%
Neuroscience 1 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2017.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,447
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,688
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#41
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.