| Title |
Timed Up and Go Test can predict recurrent falls: a longitudinal study of the community-dwelling elderly in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s138287 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li Kang, Peipei Han, Jiazhong Wang, Yixuan Ma, Liye Jia, Liyuan Fu, Hairui Yu, Xiaoyu Chen, Kaijun Niu, Qi Guo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Researcher | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 59 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 68 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,557
of 1,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,227
of 342,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#50
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.