| Title |
Revision, uptake and coding issues related to the open access Orchard Sports Injury Classification System (OSICS) versions 8, 9 and 10.1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.2147/oajsm.s7715 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Orchard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 29 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,542,164
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#129
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,570
of 99,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them