The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
MicroRNA-211 promotes non-small-cell lung cancer proliferation and invasion by targeting MxA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
OncoTargets and therapy, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ott.s143084 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mafei Kang, Jieqiong Shi, Na Peng, Shaozhong He |
| Abstract |
Recent studies have shown that microRNAs play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of cancer. In our current study, the expression levels of microRNA-211 (miR-211) were measured in human non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues and cell lines. We found that miR-211 expression levels were increased in NSCLC tissues and cell lines and that the overexpression of miR-211 promotes cell proliferation and invasion. Using bioinformatics, we demonstrated that miR-211 binds to the 3'-untranslated region of MxA and overexpression of miR-211 suppresses the expression of MxA at both the transcriptional and translational levels in NSCLC cell lines. Furthermore, knockdown of MxA increased the proliferation and invasion of NSCLC cell lines in vitro. High levels of miR-211 expression were associated with a shorter survival time in patients with NSCLC. Taken together, these results suggest that miR-211 promotes tumor proliferation and invasion by regulating MxA expression in NSCLC. This study provides insights into molecular mechanisms of miR-211-mediated tumorigenesis and oncogenesis. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 42% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 25% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 8% |
| Engineering | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,597
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,227
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#50
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.