Title |
Detection of colorectal cancer in symptomatic outpatients without visible rectal bleeding: Validity of the fecal occult blood test
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, September 2009
|
DOI | 10.2147/clep.s7097 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Niels Christian Bjerregaard, Anders Tøttrup, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Søren Laurberg |
Abstract |
In 2002, a new diagnostic strategy in symptomatic outpatients without known established colorectal cancer risk factors aged 40 years or older was implemented in Denmark. Fecal occult blood test (Hemoccult Sensa®) was a part of that strategy in patients without visible rectal bleeding. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Iraq | 1 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 23% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 19% |
Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 81% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,449,539
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#290
of 714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,383
of 91,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them