↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Drug development strategies for the treatment of obesity: how to ensure efficacy, safety, and sustainable weight loss

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Drug development strategies for the treatment of obesity: how to ensure efficacy, safety, and sustainable weight loss
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, December 2014
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s53129
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Barja-Fernandez, R Leis, FF Casanueva, LM Seoane

Abstract

The prevalence of obesity has increased worldwide, and approximately 25%-35% of the adult population is obese in some countries. The excess of body fat is associated with adverse health consequences. Considering the limited efficacy of diet and exercise in the current obese population and the use of bariatric surgery only for morbid obesity, it appears that drug therapy is the only available method to address the problem on a large scale. Currently, pharmacological obesity treatment options are limited. However, new antiobesity drugs acting through central nervous system pathways or the peripheral adiposity signals and gastrointestinal tract are under clinical development. One of the most promising approaches is the use of peptides that influence the peripheral satiety signals and brain-gut axis such as GLP-1 analogs. However, considering that any antiobesity drug may affect one or several of the systems that control food intake and energy expenditure, it is unlikely that a single pharmacological agent will be effective as a striking obesity treatment. Thus, future strategies to treat obesity will need to be directed at sustainable weight loss to ensure maximal safety. This strategy will probably require the coadministration of medications that act through different mechanisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 18%
Student > Master 16 12%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 39 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Chemistry 7 5%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 43 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,817,194
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#1,418
of 2,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,440
of 370,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#31
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.