↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Parkinson's disease: carbidopa, nausea, and dyskinesia

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 179)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Parkinson's disease: carbidopa, nausea, and dyskinesia
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, November 2014
DOI 10.2147/cpaa.s72234
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marty Hinz, Alvin Stein, Ted Cole

Abstract

When l-dopa use began in the early 1960s for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, nausea and reversible dyskinesias were experienced as continuing side effects. Carbidopa or benserazide was added to l-dopa in 1975 solely to control nausea. Subsequent to the increasing use of carbidopa has been the recognition of irreversible dyskinesias, which have automatically been attributed to l-dopa. The research into the etiology of these phenomena has identified the causative agent of the irreversible dyskinesias as carbidopa, not l-dopa. The mechanism of action of the carbidopa and benserazide causes irreversible binding and inactivation of vitamin B6 throughout the body. The consequences of this action are enormous, interfering with over 300 enzyme and protein functions. This has the ability to induce previously undocumented profound antihistamine dyskinesias, which have been wrongly attributed to l-dopa and may be perceived as irreversible if proper corrective action is not taken.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 24%
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,811,901
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#7
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,712
of 273,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them