↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Incidence of diabetes and its mortality according to body mass index in South Koreans aged 40–79 years

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Incidence of diabetes and its mortality according to body mass index in South Koreans aged 40–79 years
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, December 2017
DOI 10.2147/clep.s146860
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hae Hyuk Jung, Ji In Park, Jin Seon Jeong

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess diabetes incidence and all-cause mortality according to baseline body mass index (BMI) and to compare relative risks of mortality associated with incident diabetes across various BMI classes in a cohort of South Korean adults. Based on data from the National Health Insurance database of Korean individuals aged 40-79 years without preexisting diabetes, we calculated BMI at the baseline health examination. We estimated the relative risk of mortality associated with incident diabetes using time-dependent Cox models and considering the time of diabetes diagnosis. We noted 29,307 incident diabetes cases and 22,940 deaths during an 8-year follow-up of the initial cohort (n=436,692) and 73,756 incident diabetes cases and 57,556 deaths during a 10-year follow-up of the replication cohort (n=850,282). Regarding all-cause mortality, time-dependent Cox models revealed statistically significant interactions between diabetes status and baseline BMI class (P=0.018 and P<0.001 in the initial and replication cohorts, respectively). In separately conducted analyses for each BMI class, diabetes-associated relative risks for BMI values of 16.0-18.4, 18.5-22.9, 23.0-24.9, 25.0-29.9, and 30.0-34.9 kg/m2 were 1.50 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-2.07), 1.39 (95% CI, 1.26-1.54), 1.20 (95% CI, 1.08-1.35), 1.18 (95% CI, 1.07-1.30), and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.74-1.28) in the initial cohort, and 1.44 (95% CI, 1.18-1.74), 1.33 (95% CI, 1.26-1.41), 1.24 (95% CI, 1.16-1.31), 1.11 (95% CI, 1.05-1.17), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.85-1.16) in the replication cohort. The increasing trend of relative risk with decreasing BMI persisted mostly among subgroups stratified according to age or sex and smoking status. Incident diabetes was associated with a greater increase in all-cause mortality risk in adults with lower BMI relative to those with higher BMI. This emphasizes the importance of treatment and prevention of type 2 diabetes among normal weight or underweight adults, particularly in Asia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2017.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#471
of 793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,764
of 444,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#26
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.