↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Anxiety in patients undergoing cataract surgery: a pre- and postoperative comparison

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 3,714)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
46 news outlets
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Anxiety in patients undergoing cataract surgery: a pre- and postoperative comparison
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2017
DOI 10.2147/opth.s146135
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A Ramirez, Frank L Brodie, Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer, Saraswathy Ramanathan

Abstract

Reducing surgery-related patient anxiety without under-emphasizing surgical risk is challenging for even the most experienced surgeon. The purpose of this study is to identify specific anxieties faced by patients in hopes of better informing the preoperative surgeon-patient dialogue. Comprehensive and specialty ophthalmology clinics at the University of California, San Francisco. A prospective, survey-based study in which a pre- and postoperative questionnaire was administered to patients undergoing routine phacoemulsification. The surgeon was masked to patient enrollment and questionnaire responses. A 36-item questionnaire on patient anxiety was developed from existing literature, building on the validated Surgical Fear Questionnaire. Patients were eligible if they were aged >18 years and willing to participate. Patients were excluded if having more than phacoemulsification alone or if unable to respond in English, and were retroactively excluded if there were complications during surgery. The primary outcome was self-reported anxiety on an 11-point Likert scale. Sixty-one patients were included for analysis. Preoperatively, patients reported greatest anxiety around the operation itself and becoming blind. Reflecting postoperatively, patients reported the greatest anxiety for the operation itself. Statistically significant decreases were greatest for anxiety about the operation failing (p<0.001) and becoming blind (p<0.001). No decrease was observed for the operation itself (p=0.1). More effort must be made to specifically discuss the steps of the operation itself and the expected visual outcomes to alleviate patient anxiety. The authors hope these data can provide insight for surgeons into patient anxiety surrounding cataract surgery and help strengthen the patient-physician relationship.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 14%
Student > Postgraduate 12 13%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 36 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 22%
Unspecified 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 36 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 343. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#95,160
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#6
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,108
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.