↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The sustained influence of prior experience induced by social observation on placebo and nocebo responses

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
The sustained influence of prior experience induced by social observation on placebo and nocebo responses
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, December 2017
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s147970
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huijuan Zhang, Lili Zhou, Hua Wei, Xuejing Lu, Li Hu

Abstract

Social observation is one of the main ways to gain experience. Similar to first-person experience, observational experience affects the effectiveness of subsequent treatments. Yet, it is still undetermined whether the influence of social observation on placebo and nocebo effects to subsequent treatments remains even if related experience occurred a few days ago. Eighty-two participants were recruited and each of them was randomly assigned to one of the four experimental groups acquiring first-person or observational experience, which was either effective or ineffective. For the first-person groups, participants were presented with pain cues paired with pain stimuli in person. In the effective condition, low pain cues were paired with low pain stimuli, and high pain cues were paired with high pain stimuli. In contrast, the associations between cues and pain stimuli were not established in the ineffective condition. Similarly, for the observational groups, participants received effective/ineffective treatment through observation. Five or six days later, all participants underwent a conditioning phase followed by a test phase composed of two tests, where participants were asked to report their perceived pain. Placebo and nocebo responses to subsequent treatments can be affected by prior experience gained several days ago regardless of acquisition ways, and both placebo and nocebo responses in the effective condition were significantly larger than those in the ineffective condition. Furthermore, once placebo and nocebo effects were elicited, the latter was more persistent, while the former was more likely to diminish. First-person and observational experience obtained a few days ago could affect the following treatments, which advance our understanding of the crucial and sustained influence of social observation on placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia, and provide insights into clinical applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 42%
Neuroscience 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,572,330
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,616
of 1,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#373,718
of 438,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#50
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.