↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Transitional-aged youth perceptions of influential factors for substance-use change and treatment seeking

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Transitional-aged youth perceptions of influential factors for substance-use change and treatment seeking
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, November 2017
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s145781
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Bowers, Kristin Cleverley, Claudia Di Clemente, Joanna Henderson

Abstract

There is an evident disparity between the number of youth who report experiencing problematic substance use and the number who seek treatment. To address this disparity, it is important to understand the reasons youth do and do not seek substance use treatment. Using qualitative data obtained from semistructured interviews with 31 youth aged 17-25 years presenting for treatment at a mental health hospital, the current study identifies themes in the factors that youth identify as having influenced them to seek or delay treatment. In alignment with self-determination theory, youth identified internal factors, such as wanting to better their academic, social, or financial situation, and external factors, such as familial pressure, as motivating them to seek treatment. Factors beyond those encompassed by self-determination theory were also revealed as having influenced youth decisions to seek treatment for substance abuse. These predominantly included structural factors, including satisfaction with previous treatment, accessibility of services, and availability of clinicians. These findings provide important insight for first-contact professionals and service providers looking to enhance youth motivation to seek and engage in treatment. Limitations and opportunities for future research are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 15 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,125,075
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,300
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,442
of 341,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.