| Title |
Skin resurfacing procedures: new and emerging options
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s50367 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mathew M Loesch, Ally-Khan Somani, Melanie M Kingsley, Jeffrey B Travers, Dan F Spandau |
| Abstract |
The demand for skin resurfacing and rejuvenating procedures has progressively increased in the last decade and has sparked several advances within the skin resurfacing field that promote faster healing while minimizing downtime and side effects for patients. Several technological and procedural skin resurfacing developments are being integrated into clinical practices today allowing clinicians to treat a broader range of patients' skin types and pathologies than in years past, with noteworthy outcomes. This article will discuss some emerging and developing resurfacing therapies and treatments that are present today and soon to be available. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,695,917
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#192
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,418
of 240,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.