↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Redox-responsive and pH-sensitive nanoparticles enhanced stability and anticancer ability of erlotinib to treat lung cancer in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Redox-responsive and pH-sensitive nanoparticles enhanced stability and anticancer ability of erlotinib to treat lung cancer in vivo
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, December 2017
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s151422
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheng Tan, Guoxiang Wang

Abstract

Erlotinib (ETB) is a well-established therapeutic for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To overcome drug resistance and severe toxicities in the clinical application, redox-responsive and pH-sensitive nanoparticle drug delivery systems were designed for the encapsulation of ETB. Poly(acrylic acid)-cystamine-oleic acid (PAA-ss-OA) was synthesized. PAA-ss-OA-modified ETB-loaded lipid nanoparticles (PAA-ETB-NPs) were prepared using the emulsification and solvent evaporation method. The tumor inhibition efficacy of PAA-ETB-NPs was compared with that of ETB-loaded lipid nanoparticles (ETB-NPs) and free ETB anticancer drugs in tumor-bearing mice. PAA-ETB-NPs had a size of 170 nm, with a zeta potential of -32 mV. The encapsulation efficiency and drug loading capacity of PAA-ETB-NPs were over 85% and 2.6%, respectively. In vitro cytotoxicity of ETB-NPs were higher than that of ETB solution. The cytotoxicity of PAA-ETB-NPs was the highest. The in vivo tumor growth inhibition by PAA-ETB-NP treatment was significantly higher than that by ETB-NPs and ETB solution. No obvious weight loss was observed in any of the treatment groups, indicating that all the treatments were well tolerated. PAA-ETB-NPs could enhance the stability and anti-cancer ability of ETB to treat lung cancer and are a promising drug delivery system for lung cancer treatment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Chemistry 4 11%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 17 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#1,753
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384,359
of 444,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#31
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.