↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Use of radiofrequency in cosmetic dermatology: focus on nonablative treatment of acne scars

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Use of radiofrequency in cosmetic dermatology: focus on nonablative treatment of acne scars
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, December 2014
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s74411
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian J Simmons, Robert D Griffith, Leyre A Falto-Aizpurua, Keyvan Nouri

Abstract

Acne is a common affliction among many teens and some adults that usually resolves over time. However, the severe sequela of acne scarring can lead to long-term psychological and psychiatric problems. There exists a multitude of modalities to treat acne scars such as more invasive surgical techniques, subcision, chemical peels, ablative lasers, fractional lasers, etc. A more recent technique for the treatment of acne scars is nonablative radiofrequency (RF) that works by passing a current through the dermis at a preset depth to produce small thermal wounds in the dermis which, in turn, stimulates dermal remodeling to produce new collagen and soften scar defects. This review article demonstrates that out of all RF modalities, microneedle bipolar RF and fractional bipolar RF treatments offers the best results for acne scarring. An improvement of 25%-75% can be expected after three to four treatment sessions using one to two passes per session. Treatment results are optimal approximately 3 months after final treatment. Common side effects can include transient pain, erythema, and scabbing. Further studies are needed to determine what RF treatment modalities work best for specific scar subtypes, so that further optimization of RF treatments for acne scars can be determined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 12%
Other 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 24 31%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 54%
Psychology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,205,295
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#344
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,003
of 369,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.