↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Prospective study on prevalence, intensity, type, and therapy of acute pain in a second-level urban emergency department

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Prospective study on prevalence, intensity, type, and therapy of acute pain in a second-level urban emergency department
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, December 2017
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s137992
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Mura, Elisabetta Serra, Franco Marinangeli, Sebastiano Patti, Mario Musu, Ilenia Piras, Maria Valeria Massidda, Giorgio Pia, Maurizio Evangelista, Gabriele Finco

Abstract

Pain represents the most frequent cause for patient admission to emergency departments (EDs). Oligoanalgesia is a common problem in this field. The aims of this study were to assess prevalence and intensity of pain in patients who visited a second-level urban ED and to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological treatment administered subsequent to variations in pain intensity. A 4-week prospective observational study was carried out on 2,838 patients who visited a second-level urban ED. Pain intensity was evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale at the moment of triage. The efficacy of prescribed analgesic therapy was evaluated at 30 and 60 minutes, and at discharge. Data concerning pain intensity were classified as absent, slight, mild, or severe. Pain was evaluated in relation to the prescribed therapy. Pain prevalence was 70.7%. Traumatic events were the primary cause in most cases (40.44%), followed by pain linked to urologic problems (13.52%), abdominal pain (13.39%), and nontraumatic musculoskeletal pain (7.10%). Only 32.46% of patients were given pharmacological therapy. Of these, 76% reported severe pain, 19% moderate, and 5% slight, and 66% received nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or paracetamol, 4% opioids, and 30% other therapies. A difference of at least 2 points on the Numerical Rating Scale was observed in 84% of patients on reevaluation following initial analgesic therapy. Pain represents one of the primary reasons for visits to EDs. Although a notable reduction in pain intensity has been highlighted in patients who received painkillers, results show that inadequate treatment of pain in ED continues to be a problem.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Unspecified 7 7%
Other 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 43 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Unspecified 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 41 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,275,508
of 24,415,997 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#446
of 1,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,085
of 446,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#15
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,415,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.