| Title |
High expression of CIP2A protein is associated with tumor aggressiveness in stage I–III NSCLC and correlates with poor prognosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
OncoTargets and therapy, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ott.s148250 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geqi Cha, Jianyu Xu, Xiangying Xu, Bin Li, Shan Lu, Abiyasi Nanding, Songliu Hu, Shilong Liu |
| Abstract |
The aim of this work was to examine the expression of cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (CIP2A) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and analyze its correlation with clinical outcomes. CIP2A protein levels were detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). One hundred and eighty-four of 209 (88.3%) primary stage I-III NSCLC specimens and 4 of 38 (10.5%) adjacent normal lung tissue specimens expressed CIP2A protein. High expression of CIP2A was detected in 38.8% (81/209) of the NSCLC specimens. Patients diagnosed histologically with late-stage NSCLC (p<0.001) and malignant nodes (p=0.001) exhibited high CIP2A expression. Univariate analysis using the log-rank test identified CIP2A expression as a prognostic predictor for overall survival (p=0.005). In multivariate analyses using the Cox regression test, CIP2A expression, T stage, N stage, histological type, and chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors (p=0.007, 0.001, 0.003, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively). Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated that high CIP2A expression indicated poor prognosis in the subgroup of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (p=0.008). Similar results were noted in the subgroup of patients with adenocarcinoma, but the results did not reach statistical significance (p=0.084). We also used univariate analysis and multivariate analysis to assess the prognostic factors for overall survival in the subgroup of patients who received postoperative chemotherapy. CIP2A expression was also an independent prognostic factor in NSCLC patients who received postoperative chemotherapy (p=0.009), along with histological type (p=0.001) and N stage (p=0.034). In conclusion, adding to the accumulating evidence, our research suggested that the CIP2A expression is associated with aggressiveness and correlates with poor prognosis in NSCLC. Our findings also indicated that CIP2A might be a potential therapeutic target against NSCLC. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 18% |
| Librarian | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#2,078
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384,359
of 444,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#62
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.