↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Morphine promotes renal pathology in sickle mice

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Morphine promotes renal pathology in sickle mice
Published in
International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, July 2012
DOI 10.2147/ijnrd.s33813
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kalpna Gupta, Weber, Vang, Velho, Gupta, Karl Nath, Crosson, Hebbel

Abstract

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are often treated with opioids for severe pain. Although opioids are known to have renal-specific effects, their role in nephropathy in SCD remains unknown. Because a subset of patients receives opioids for long periods of time, we examined the influence of chronic morphine treatment on mice with pre-existing renal disease expressing varying amounts of sickle hemoglobin. Morphine treatment for 3-6 weeks resulted in a variety of defects in renal morphology observed using light and electron microscopy. Notably, morphine induced glomerular pathology, resulting in increased glomerular volume, mesangial expansion, mesangial cell proliferation, parietal cell metaplasia, podocyte effacement, and microvillus transformation. Cystic tubulopathy and hemeoxygenase-1 expression and activity were also increased in morphine-treated mice. Naloxone, a non-selective opioid receptor (OR) antagonist, ameliorated these effects. Functionally, the urine albumin to creatinine ratio was increased following acute as well as chronic morphine treatment. These results suggest that clinically relevant doses of morphine induce renal pathology and that OR antagonists may be effective for ameliorating morphine-induced renal disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#222
of 257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,964
of 176,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.