↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Differentiation between chalazion and sebaceous carcinoma by noninvasive meibography

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Differentiation between chalazion and sebaceous carcinoma by noninvasive meibography
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2014
DOI 10.2147/opth.s69804
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuji Nemoto, Reiko Arita, Atsushi Mizota, Yuko Sasajima

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 16%
Other 4 13%
Professor 3 9%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#632
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,276
of 248,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.