| Title |
Patient perspectives of telemedicine quality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s67506 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cynthia M LeRouge, Monica J Garfield, Alan R Hevner |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to explore the quality attributes required for effective telemedicine encounters from the perspective of the patient. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 24% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#15,740,505
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#864
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,703
of 369,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.