↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Low expression of DAB2IP predicts an unfavorable prognosis in human bladder carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Low expression of DAB2IP predicts an unfavorable prognosis in human bladder carcinoma
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, November 2017
DOI 10.2147/ott.s146952
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linfeng Zheng, Kaiyan Chen, Liang Zhu, Dan Su, Guoping Cheng

Abstract

The DOC-2/DAB2 interactive protein (DAB2IP) is a novel member of the Ras GTPase-activating protein family, and its downregulation is an unfavorable prognostic factor in several human malignancies. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological features, outcomes, and DAB2IP expression in 77 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). Expression of DAB2IP and p-STAT3 was examined in tumors and in matched adjacent non-cancerous tissues, using immunohistochemistry. We found a marked reduction in the expression of DAB2IP in UCB specimens, which was significantly associated with advanced pathological stage (P=0.037), high pathological grade (P=0.016), and muscle invasion (P=0.004). Moreover, multivariate analysis identified DAB2IP as an independent prognostic factor of cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] =0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.07-0.78, P=0.018). Most importantly, DAB2IP was negatively correlated with p-STAT3 expression (P=0.009), which predicted a shorter overall survival in patients with UCB (HR =2.68, 95% CI =1.63-6.99, P=0.044). In conclusion, downregulation of DAB2IP is associated with features of biologically aggressive UCB and may be a promising biomarker in patients after radical cystectomy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#2,078
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,290
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#65
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.