| Title |
Synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial evaluation of novel 5-benzoyl-N-substituted amino- and 5-benzoyl-N-sulfonylamino-4-alkylsulfanyl-2-pyridones
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/dddt.s149615 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Galal Elgemeie, Farag Altalbawy, Mohammed Alfaidi, Rania Azab, Atef Hassan |
| Abstract |
The present research describes the synthesis of novel 5-benzoyl-N-substituted-amino- and 5-benzoyl-N-sulfonylamino-4-alkylsulfanyl-2-pyridones 5a-c and 6a-c via the reaction of 2-benzoyl-3,3-bis(alkylthio)acrylonitriles 2a-c with N-cyanoacetohydrazide 3 and cyanoaceto-N-phenylsulfonylhydrazide 4, respectively. Also, the reactivity of the compounds 5a-c toward hydrazine hydrate to give product 1H-pyrazolo[4,3-c]pyridine derivative 7 was studied. In addition, the reactivity of the 2a-c toward 1-cyanoacetyl-4 arylidenesemicarbazides 8a-c afforded 3,5-dihydro[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine-6-carbonitrile derivatives (12-14)a-c, which reacted with hydrazine hydrate to give 3H-pyrazolo[4,3-c][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine-6-carbonitrile derivatives 15a-c. The structures of the new products were characterized based on 1H nuclear magnetic resonance, 13C nuclear magnetic resonance, infrared, mass-spectroscopy, and elemental analyses. The products were screened in vitro for their antibacterial and antifungal activity properties. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Engineering | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,400,762
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#1,114
of 2,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,771
of 341,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#24
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.