↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Microtubule inhibitor-based antibody–drug conjugates for cancer therapy

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Microtubule inhibitor-based antibody–drug conjugates for cancer therapy
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, December 2014
DOI 10.2147/ott.s46887
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelsey Klute, Eleni Nackos, Shinsuke Tasaki, Daniel P Nguyen, Neil H Bander, Scott T Tagawa

Abstract

The specificity of monoclonal antibodies represents a potential therapeutic advantage, but their use as single agents in oncology has proven limited to date. The development of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) takes advantage of the specificity of the monoclonal antibody and potent cytotoxic effect of chemotherapy, leading to enhanced cytotoxicity in target cells and limiting toxicity to normal tissue. Microtubules represent a validated oncologic target in a range of tumor types, with a number of anti-microtubule targeting cytotoxic drugs approved for cancer use. The systemic use of potent microtubule-binding agents is limited by their effects in normal cells, which leads to toxicity including myelosuppression and peripheral neuropathy. Linking these agents to monoclonal antibodies may limit toxicity to normal tissues and increase drug concentration in target tissues, also allowing the use of more potent agents which would be too toxic to administer in their unbound form. Two such ADCs have been approved for clinical use and many others are in development. Here we review the characteristics of each of the ADC components that have led to efficacious therapies and discuss some of the tubulin inhibitor-based ADCs in development for cancer therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
France 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 69 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Other 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 22 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,355,005
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#378
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,319
of 369,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.