↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Injuries and disorders among young ice skaters: relationship with generalized joint laxity and tightness

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Injuries and disorders among young ice skaters: relationship with generalized joint laxity and tightness
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, August 2014
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s63540
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinobu Okamura, Naoki Wada, Masayuki Tazawa, Makoto Sohmiya, Yoko Ibe, Toru Shimizu, Shigeru Usuda, Kenji Shirakura

Abstract

This study retrospectively investigated 192 teenage speed and figure skaters with prior injuries documented by an athletes' questionnaire, who underwent a physical examination to assess their muscle tightness and generalized joint laxity. In all athletes, the degree of muscle tightness and joint laxity were measured by a standardized physical examination. A descriptive report of the types of injuries showed a predominance of fractures, ligament injuries, enthesitis, and lower back pain. Approximately 5% of all skaters tested positive for tightness, while 25.8% of figure skaters and 15.2% of speed skaters had generalized ligamentous laxity. Statistical testing showed an association between ankle sprains and muscle tightness, and an association between knee enthesitis and muscle tightness in skating athletes. There was also an association between lower back pain and generalized joint laxity, which held true only for the male skaters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Student > Bachelor 16 21%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 27%
Sports and Recreations 16 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Engineering 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,711,939
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#121
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,567
of 240,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.